The Compensation Question

Can anything morally outweigh or compensate for extreme suffering? This simple question strikes at the heart of ethics. Yet too often, it is neglected. It may be hard to think about this question in the abstract. To bring it into focus, let us consider a few concrete cases.

The Drowning Child

Perhaps you have encountered Peter Singer’s drowning child thought experiment. You see a child struggling in a pond; you can save them easily, though it means you will ruin your expensive shoes. Plausibly, you ought to save the child. [...] 

Read more

Facing Up to the Worst

Most efforts to reduce suffering focus on helping individuals alive today. This is understandable, given the tragedies that currently exist. Many millions of people endure immense suffering due to poverty, wars, disasters, chronic pain, depression, and so on. On an even greater scale, tens of billions of animals live and die miserably in factory farms built to facilitate their mass exploitation and abuse. Beyond human civilisation, there are billions upon billions of wild animals who suffer serious harms.

But what about the possibility of a future moral catastrophe? What if such tragedies could potentially take place on an even larger scale? And what can we do now to prevent that from happening? [...] 

Read more

Magnus Vinding Discusses Upcoming Book on the Utilitarian Podcast

CRS researcher and co-founder Magnus Vinding made a recent appearance on the Utilitarian Podcast hosted by Gus Docker.

Magnus begins by presenting a number of arguments in favor of suffering-focused views and then proceeds to discuss their practical implications. In particular, he explores how we can best reduce suffering for people, animals, and potentially even artificial sentient beings in the future.  [...] 

Read more

Tobias Baumann on the Sentience Institute Podcast

CRS researcher and co-founder Tobias Baumann recently appeared as a guest on the Sentience Institute Podcast. The podcast, hosted by researcher Jamie Harris, typically focuses on moral circle expansion and animal welfare. Tobias was featured in two episodes.

The first episode covers moral circle expansion, cause prioritization, and s-risks. In particular, Tobias explains what moral circle expansion is and presents arguments for and against prioritizing it. He then gives his take on longtermism, transformative AI, and whether we’re currently living at the hinge of history. Jamie and Tobias also consider the implications of accepting both longtermism and a focus on moral circle expansion, including what beings to advocate for and how to do it most effectively. Finally, Tobias argues that we should focus on reducing risks of astronomical suffering known as s-risks. [...] 

Read more

2020 End-of-Year Fundraiser

2020 has been an exciting year for us. We officially set up the Center for Reducing Suffering (CRS) as an organisation, launched this website, and published articles on sufferingfocused ethics, s-risks, and cause prioritisation. We are now raising money to consolidate our financial situation.

We believe that CRS’s open-ended research programme on how to best reduce suffering fills an important gap. To help donors make informed choices, we are fully transparent about our values and our strategy — for more details on why we do what we do, see our Strategic Plan.  [...] 

Read more